Planning a Credit-Bearing Course on AI and Information Literacy
Presented by Alyssa Russo and David Hurley from the University of New Mexico
Introduction
Alyssa Russo, Learning Services Librarian, and David Hurley, Discovery and Web Librarian at the University of New Mexico (UNM), shared their experiences and plans for developing a credit-bearing course titled "Artificial Intelligence and Information Literacy." This presentation delved into the rationale, structure, and pedagogical approaches they considered while designing the course, aiming to integrate generative AI tools like ChatGPT into information literacy instruction.
Background and Context
The advent of ChatGPT and similar generative AI technologies prompted librarians at UNM to reconsider their approaches to information literacy instruction. Recognizing the profound impact of AI on information systems and user behavior, Russo and Hurley sought to develop a course that not only addressed the practical use of AI tools but also engaged students in critical thinking about the social and ethical implications of these technologies.
At UNM, the library operates within a unique structure, being part of the Organizational Information and Learning Sciences (OILS) program. This affiliation allows librarians to teach credit-bearing courses that explore theoretical aspects of information literacy beyond traditional library instruction. Leveraging this opportunity, Russo and Hurley aimed to create a three-credit course that would encourage students to think critically about how AI reshapes information landscapes.
Inspirational Framework
The presenters drew inspiration from Barbara Fister's perspective on information literacy, emphasizing the need to understand the architectures, infrastructures, and belief systems that shape our information environment. They recognized that generative AI challenges conventional notions of authority, value, and the processes underlying information creation and dissemination.
Hurley noted parallels between current responses to AI and past reactions to disruptive technologies like Google and Wikipedia. In the early days of the web, librarians grappled with similar concerns about information quality and authority. By examining historical responses—ranging from rejection to revolutionary integration—they identified strategies to effectively incorporate AI into information literacy education.
Course Structure and Objectives
Utilizing the ACRL Framework
To provide a solid foundation, the course was structured around the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Each of the six frames served as a module, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of core concepts. This approach also aligned well with the eight-week accelerated format of the course, providing sufficient time for introduction, in-depth exploration, and reflection.
Hybrid Learning Model
Recognizing the benefits of both in-person and online learning, the course was designed as a hybrid. Meeting twice a week, the first session would introduce key concepts and AI tools, while the second would be student-led, fostering a community of practice. This structure aimed to balance guided instruction with collaborative learning, encouraging students to share insights and take ownership of their learning process.
Target Audience and Enrollment
The course was intended for upper-division undergraduates who had prior college-level coursework. This prerequisite ensured that students possessed foundational academic skills, enabling them to engage deeply with complex topics and contribute meaningfully to discussions and projects.
Assignments and Activities
Researchers' Notebook
A central component of the course was the "Researchers' Notebook," an iterative assignment where students documented their evolving thoughts, questions, and interactions with AI tools. This notebook aimed to make the research process visible, emphasizing the development of inquiry skills and reflective practice. By capturing moments of discovery, frustration, and dialogue with AI, students could illustrate their understanding of information literacy concepts in a tangible way.
Module Deep Dive: Research as Inquiry
Focusing on the ACRL frame "Research as Inquiry," one module exemplified the course's pedagogical approach. The objectives were to have students view research as an open-ended exploration and to formulate increasingly sophisticated questions. Activities included:
- Question Formulation Technique: Students engaged in generating, refining, and prioritizing questions related to AI. This collaborative exercise encouraged curiosity and critical thinking, serving as a model for ongoing inquiry throughout the course.
- Walk and Talk Activity: Adapted from the University of Arizona's Atlas of Creative Tools, this exercise involved students pairing up and discussing prompts while walking around campus. Questions like "What is curiosity to you?" and "What challenges does AI face in understanding human questions?" facilitated deeper engagement and embodied learning.
Other Modules and Activities
While the presentation focused on one module in detail, Russo and Hurley outlined plans for other modules based on the remaining ACRL frames. These included activities such as:
- Authority Is Constructed and Contextual: Exploring how authority is established in different information sources and how AI-generated content challenges traditional notions of authority.
- Searching as Strategic Exploration: Comparing search strategies in traditional databases versus AI tools, emphasizing iteration and strategy refinement.
- Information Has Value: Discussing the ethical, legal, and economic implications of AI-generated content, including issues of intellectual property and environmental impact.
Challenges and Reflections
Despite their thorough planning, Russo and Hurley faced challenges in promoting and enrolling students in the course. Both were on different types of leave during critical promotion periods, resulting in insufficient enrollment for the course to run as scheduled. Initially disappointed, they reconsidered and recognized that the course content remained relevant and valuable, even as the initial hype around AI began to settle.
They emphasized that the rapidly evolving nature of AI and its integration into various aspects of society make such a course timely and essential. By sharing their experience, they hoped to inspire others to develop similar courses or integrate these ideas into existing curricula.
Conclusion and Takeaways
Russo and Hurley's presentation highlighted the importance of adapting information literacy instruction to address the challenges and opportunities presented by generative AI. By framing the course around collaborative exploration and critical engagement, they aimed to empower students to navigate and contribute to the evolving information landscape.
Key takeaways from their experience include:
- The value of integrating established frameworks (like the ACRL frames) with new technologies to provide structure and depth.
- The effectiveness of hybrid learning models in fostering community and active participation.
- The importance of reflective and process-oriented assignments, such as the Researchers' Notebook, in making the research process transparent and meaningful.
- The need for flexibility and adaptability in course planning, acknowledging that challenges like enrollment and shifting student interests may arise.
- The relevance of addressing ethical considerations, including environmental impacts and biases inherent in AI technologies.
Final Thoughts
While their course did not run as initially planned, Russo and Hurley remain optimistic about its potential and relevance. They encouraged other educators and librarians to consider similar approaches, emphasizing that the need for critical engagement with AI and information literacy is ongoing.
Their work serves as a valuable model for integrating emerging technologies into educational practices, fostering not only skill development but also critical awareness and ethical considerations among students.
Note: This summary is based on a presentation by Alyssa Russo and David Hurley on planning a credit-bearing course on AI and information literacy at the University of New Mexico.