Translate

Search This Blog

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Understanding Generative AI: Implications for Academic Integrity and Citation

Ethical and Productive—Considering Generative Artificial Intelligence Citation Across Learning and Research



Introduction

  • Host: Daniel Pfeiffer from Choice and LibTech Insights.
  • Speakers:
    • Kari Weaver: Learning, Teaching, and Instructional Design Librarian at the University of Waterloo.
    • Antonio Muñoz Gómez: Digital Scholarship Librarian at the University of Waterloo.
  • Context: Discussion on ethical considerations and citation practices for generative AI tools like ChatGPT in academia.

Acknowledgment of Land

  • Recognition of the traditional territories where the University of Waterloo is situated.
  • Reflection on how citation practices are influenced by colonial approaches to knowledge ownership.

Background of the Project

  • Campus Context:
    • Research-intensive university with over 42,000 students.
    • Home to the Waterloo Artificial Intelligence Institute.
  • Emergence of Generative AI:
    • Open availability of tools like ChatGPT sparked campus-wide discussions.
    • Initial focus on AI's impact on teaching, learning, and academic integrity.

Focus on Citation Practices

  • Purpose of Citation:
    • Creates an information trail and establishes academic connections.
    • Provides standardization and consistency in student assignments.
    • Supports academic integrity through transparency.
  • Challenges with AI-generated Content:
    • Difficulty in citing AI-generated outputs.
    • Lack of initial guidance from traditional citation styles.
    • Need for practical solutions for students and faculty.

Ethical Dimensions

  • Academic Integrity Concerns:
    • Fear of students using AI to cheat on assignments.
    • Issues with AI detection software misidentifying non-native English speakers.
  • Power Dynamics:
    • Discrepancy in the use of AI tools between students and instructors.
    • Data privacy concerns when student work is uploaded to detection software.
  • Reproducibility and Accountability:
    • AI outputs are inconsistent; same prompts yield different results.
    • Challenges in preserving AI-generated content for verification.

Citation in Research vs. Learning Contexts

  • Research Context:
    • AI tools generally not allowed as authors in publications.
    • AI-generated images discouraged due to reliability concerns.
    • Disclosure of AI use required in methodology sections.
  • Learning Context:
    • Adaptation of citation practices to include AI tools.
    • Encouragement for students to be transparent about AI use.

Development of Resources

  • Initial Outputs:
    • Created a LibGuide on ChatGPT and generative AI.
    • Developed infographics and annotated prompts illustrating citation practices.
  • Ongoing Work:
    • Updating resources to include guidance on citing AI-generated images and videos.
    • Exploring AI tools for literature reviews and knowledge synthesis.
  • Campus Collaboration:
    • Formed a campus-wide committee with diverse representation.
    • Contributed to faculty programming and standardized syllabus language.
    • Supported resource development in partnership with other academic units.

Library Initiatives

  • Internal Exploration:
    • Monthly sessions on AI tools like Whisper for transcription.
    • Workshops on AI and machine learning in academic libraries.
  • Interest Groups and Bibliographies:
    • Formed an interest group on AI within the library.
    • Created a Zotero bibliography with curated readings on AI topics.
  • Future Directions:
    • Participation in provincial and federal AI initiatives for academic libraries.

Q&A Session Highlights

  • Use of AI in Professional Practice:
    • Librarians using AI tools for brainstorming and instructional design.
  • Access to Paywalled Content:
    • AI tools generally cannot access content behind paywalls unless provided by the user.
  • Guidance on AI Use in Assignments:
    • Importance of transparency and attribution when students use AI for brainstorming or editing.
    • Encouragement for faculty to discuss AI expectations with students.
  • Ethical Considerations:
    • Need to address citation as a colonial practice and explore decolonized approaches.
    • Challenges with integrated AI features in tools and implications for citation.
  • Institutional Policies:
    • University of Waterloo currently has no formal policy on AI use.
    • Emphasis on ongoing conversations and collaborative efforts to address AI's impact.

Conclusion

  • Recognition of the complexities and rapid development of AI technologies.
  • Importance of grappling with ethical, practical, and pedagogical implications.
  • Encouragement for open dialogue between faculty, students, and librarians.
  • Acknowledgment of the need for adaptable approaches rather than rigid policies.

Note: This summary captures key points from a presentation discussing the ethical considerations and citation practices related to the use of generative AI tools in academic learning and research contexts.

Streamline Your Writing Process with QuillBot Flow: A Comprehensive Overview

Introduction to QuillBot Flow—Enhancing Your Writing Process



Introduction

  • Host: Gul, leading Business Development at QuillBot.
  • Team Members Present:
    • Aim: Handling administrative issues.
    • Ashish: Addressing general questions.
    • Jerry: Addressing product-related questions.
  • Audience Engagement:
    • Participants from around the world, including Tanzania, Indonesia, Scotland, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Netherlands, Philippines, Mexico, USA, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and South Korea.
    • Shared favorite quotes and New Year greetings to foster community spirit.

Webinar Overview

  • Purpose: To introduce QuillBot Flow, an AI-powered writing tool designed to streamline and enhance the writing process.
  • Agenda:
    • Introduction to QuillBot and its mission.
    • Deep dive into QuillBot Flow features.
    • Interactive Q&A session.
    • Special surprise announcement for attendees.

About QuillBot

  • Founded: In 2017 by three computer science graduates from the University of Illinois—Rohan Gupta, Anil Jason, and Dave S.
  • Headquarters: Chicago, USA, and Jaipur, India.
  • Mission: To make the writing process painless and help users grow and learn as writers.
  • User Base:
    • Over 35 million monthly active users.
    • More than 50 million users globally.
  • Key Features:
    • AI writing tools for drafting, brainstorming, researching, editing, proofreading, creating citations, summarizing, and translating.
    • Ad-free platform focused on user efficiency.

Introduction to QuillBot Flow

  • Formerly Known As: QuillBot's Co-Writer.
  • Description: A comprehensive AI writing platform integrating all of QuillBot's tools in one place.
  • Demonstration Highlights:
    • Templates:
      • Options for blogs, academic papers, emails, letters, and custom templates.
    • Structure Generation:
      • Helps create an outline or flow for writing projects.
    • Research Assistance:
      • Integrated search within the platform.
      • Ability to insert researched content directly into the document.
    • QuillBot Flares:
      • Generate ideas, complete paragraphs, add examples or counter-examples.
    • Paraphrasing Modes:
      • Multiple styles (e.g., standard, fluency, formal) and multilingual capabilities.
    • Summarizer Tool:
      • Condenses long texts into key sentences or paragraphs.
    • Translation Feature:
      • Supports over 45 languages, including French, German, and Spanish.
    • Plagiarism Checker:
      • Scans documents for originality and assists with citations.
    • AI Review:
      • Offers suggestions to improve writing style and tone.
    • Suggest Text Feature:
      • Predicts the next sentence based on the current content.
    • Dictate and Listen Feature:
      • Converts speech to text and text to speech for increased productivity.

Interactive Q&A Session

  • Poll Conducted:
    • Asked attendees what they hoped to gain from the webinar.
    • Majority wanted to learn how to enhance their writing process.
  • Common Questions Addressed:
    • Differences Between QuillBot and Other Tools:
      • Multilingual paraphrasing accuracy.
      • Integrated features like summarizer and translator.
    • Subscription Options and Discounts:
      • Availability of monthly, semi-annual, and annual subscriptions.
      • Special discounts for students and educational institutions.
    • Language and Accent Adjustments:
      • Ability to choose between American, British, Canadian, and Australian English.
    • Upcoming Webinars:
      • Plans for future sessions covering various topics based on user feedback.
    • Templates and Citation Support:
      • Access to multiple templates and citation formats (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).
    • Device Accessibility:
      • QuillBot is accessible across different devices.
  • Feedback Encouraged:
    • Participants were invited to share topics they would like covered in future webinars.
    • Emphasized the importance of user feedback in improving QuillBot.

Special Surprise for Attendees

  • Exclusive Offer:
    • A 50% discount on the annual premium subscription.
    • Valid for 24 hours post-webinar.
    • Coupon code provided during the session.
  • How to Avail:
    • Instructions to contact support if assistance is needed with the coupon code.
    • Encouraged to reach out via email or the QuillBot website for any queries.

Conclusion

  • Gratitude Expressed:
    • Thanked attendees for their participation and engagement.
    • Expressed excitement about the overwhelming response.
  • Encouragement to Connect:
    • Invited attendees to follow QuillBot on social media for updates.
    • Encouraged sharing feedback and suggestions for future webinars.
  • Final Remarks:
    • Wished everyone a great and exciting journey ahead.
    • Anticipated how QuillBot's tools can empower users to achieve writing excellence.

Note: This summary captures key points from a webinar introducing QuillBot Flow, an AI-powered writing platform designed to enhance and streamline the writing process by integrating multiple tools into one comprehensive solution.

Navigating the AI Landscape: How Libraries Can Adapt

Libraries and AI—Challenges and Responses


Introduction

  • Host: Don from the Gigabit Libraries Network.
  • Speakers:
    • Andrew Cox: Member of the AI Special Interest Group at IFLA; Information School in Sheffield.
    • Richard Whitt: President of GLIA Foundation.
  • Series Context: Part of the "Libraries in Response" series on technology issues affecting libraries.

Context and Background

  • Libraries are facing multiple crises: COVID-19, climate change, political unrest, and AI.
  • AI is seen as both an opportunity and a challenge for libraries.
  • The importance of libraries as trusted institutions in navigating technological changes.

Challenges of AI for Libraries

  • Existential Concerns: AI's potential impact on humanity and societal structures.
  • Trust Issues: Ensuring AI agents act in the best interest of users, avoiding "double agents."
  • Digital Divide: AI might exacerbate inequalities between connected and unconnected communities.
  • Regulatory Landscape:
    • Federal and state policies are being developed to address AI.
    • Challenges in effectively regulating complex AI technologies.

Role of Libraries in the Age of AI

  • Leveraging the high trust in libraries to guide communities through AI challenges.
  • Promoting AI literacy and responsible AI use among patrons.
  • Developing AI capabilities, including data stewardship and ethical practices.
  • Potential partnerships with technology companies for AI development.

Presentations

Richard Whitt

  • Referenced Cerf's work on digital libraries and intelligent agents (knowbots).
  • Discussed the rise of AI bots and personal digital assistants.
  • Introduced the concept of "double agents" in AI that may not serve users' best interests.
  • Highlighted potential roles for libraries:
    • Providing infrastructure and connectivity.
    • Serving as repositories of trustworthy digital knowledge.
    • Acting as fiduciaries with obligations to patrons.
    • Developing AI agents aligned with library values.
    • Educating patrons on AI and digital citizenship.

Andrew Cox

  • Introduced the work of the IFLA AI Special Interest Group.
  • Presented a strategic framework for libraries responding to AI challenges.
  • Discussed the AI capability model:
    • Material Resources: Data and infrastructure needs.
    • Human Resources: Technical and business skills required.
    • Intangible Resources: Leadership, coordination, and adaptability.
  • Suggested key actions for libraries:
    • Implement responsible and explainable AI solutions.
    • Enhance data stewardship and management skills.
    • Promote AI literacy and critical understanding among patrons.
  • Addressed challenges like resource limitations and the need for collaboration and vision.

Discussion and Audience Participation

  • Practical Steps for Libraries:
    • Start small with AI projects relevant to existing services.
    • Define a clear vision for AI integration.
    • Collaborate with other libraries and institutions.
  • Partnerships with Tech Companies:
    • Potential benefits and risks of collaborating with technology firms.
    • Need for libraries to advocate for ethical AI practices.
  • Comments from Participants:
    • Diane: Shared a tool developed by her library using AI to assist patrons; emphasized the importance of prompt engineering.
    • Stephen Abram: Highlighted the need for collaborative efforts, use cases, and establishing guardrails for AI implementation.
    • Fiona: Mentioned Toronto Public Library's leadership in using AI.

Conclusion

  • Recognized that AI presents both significant challenges and opportunities for libraries.
  • Emphasized the unique position of libraries to leverage trust and promote ethical AI use.
  • Committed to ongoing discussions and exploring AI's impact on libraries in future sessions.
  • Encouraged proactive engagement with AI, focusing on community needs and responsible practices.

Note: This outline summarizes a presentation on how libraries can respond to the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, featuring insights from industry experts and audience participation.