AI Policies in Higher Education

Link to spreadsheet

Navigating the AI Policy Landscape in Higher Education

In recent years, integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic institutions has gained significant attention, with enthusiasm and caution. As AI continues to evolve and its potential for transforming education becomes more apparent, universities have established policies to guide its responsible use. 

Let us delve into how six renowned universities, including their faculty and students, are shaping the future of AI in their academic realms. We will explore the various applications of AI in teaching, research, and administration and the ethical and social implications associated with its use. Through this examination, we hope to gain a deeper understanding of how AI can be harnessed to enhance the quality of education while ensuring its responsible and ethical implementation.

**Harvard University**

Harvard University has taken a proactive stance in advocating for the responsible use of AI, with a strong emphasis on data privacy and academic integrity. The University's approach is focused on ensuring that ethical AI use is at the forefront, helping to prevent the misuse of confidential data and providing that AI is used responsibly and transparently. While this approach may limit the application of AI in certain sensitive research areas, Harvard's emphasis on guidance over restriction offers a highly flexible framework that other institutions with explicit bans do not provide. In addition, Harvard's approach also focuses on educating individuals about the ethical use of AI, allowing them to understand better the potential benefits and risks associated with this rapidly evolving technology. Overall, Harvard's approach to AI is comprehensive, thoughtful, and designed to promote the responsible and ethical use of AI across a wide range of applications and research areas.

**University of Chicago**

At the University of Chicago, strict guidelines are in place regarding the use of AI in exams, especially within the Law School. The institution prohibits using AI-generated work in exams and considers it a form of plagiarism if the work is not properly attributed. This strong stance is intended to promote academic integrity and ensure that students are evaluated fairly based on their abilities and efforts. However, this policy also means that the educational benefits of AI in assessments are limited. The University of Chicago's approach is notably more stringent than other universities that allow more instructional freedom. 

Despite AI's potential benefits in enhancing learning outcomes, the University prioritizes maintaining academic rigor and preventing academic misconduct through these measures. At the University of Chicago, strict guidelines are in place regarding the use of AI in exams, especially within the Law School. The institution prohibits using AI-generated work in exams and considers it a form of plagiarism if the work is not properly attributed. This strong stance is intended to promote academic integrity and ensure that students are evaluated fairly based on their abilities and efforts. However, this policy also means that the educational benefits of AI in assessments are limited. 

The University of Chicago's approach is notably more stringent than other universities that allow more instructional freedom. Despite AI's potential benefits in enhancing learning outcomes, the University prioritizes maintaining academic rigor and preventing academic misconduct through these measures.

**Carnegie Mellon University**

Carnegie Mellon University has a comprehensive academic integrity policy that encompasses the use of AI technology. The approach allows instructors to make individual decisions about using AI in their courses, providing them the flexibility to create a dynamic and innovative learning experience for their students. However, the lack of defined guidelines could result in inconsistent policy application across various departments. In contrast to other universities with more specific policies, Carnegie Mellon's approach allows for greater autonomy in the classroom. However, it requires instructors to exercise discretion and ensure that the use of AI is appropriate and consistent with the University's values.

**University of Texas at Austin**

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in various industries, including academia, universities have established policies to regulate its use. One such institution is the University of Texas at Austin, which advises caution when dealing with personal or sensitive information and urges AI users to coordinate procuring AI tools. 

The University's policy is similar to Harvard's protective stance but with an additional layer of procedural complexity aimed at ensuring data protection. While this approach ensures that sensitive information remains secure, it may introduce bureaucratic hurdles not present in other universities' policies. Nonetheless, such policies are important to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of individual's personal information, especially in the age of big data and the increasing use of AI in various fields.

**Walden University**

At Walden University, there is a strong emphasis on the educational approach to AI-generated content. The University mandates that any AI-generated content be cited and verified using Turnitin, not as a punitive measure but as a learning aid. This approach fosters an environment of transparency, accountability, and learning about AI, which is unique to Walden University. Unlike other institutions, Walden's policy is focused on education rather than punishment, which sets a precedent for other universities to follow. By prioritizing education and transparency, Walden University is paving the way for a more informed and responsible approach to AI-generated content in the academic world.

**The University of Alabama**

The University of Alabama has proposed a policy recommending that faculty members incorporate AI tools in their academic work and cite them accordingly. This policy encourages innovative teaching methods and techniques while ensuring academic rigor in the educational system. The University's stance on this matter aligns closely with CMU's, which promotes teaching innovation. However, the former takes it a step further by emphasizing the need for pedagogical adaptation to meet the evolving needs of the students and the academic landscape. By embracing AI tools in the curriculum, faculty members can explore new avenues of research and teaching, ultimately leading to a more effective and engaging learning experience for the students.

Summary

As AI technology continues to evolve, many universities have recognized its transformative potential and are exploring ways to incorporate it into their academic programs. However, while embracing this new frontier, educational institutions prioritize data privacy and academic integrity. This has led to a wide variance in AI policies from one University to another. For instance, Harvard University has adopted an advisory approach to AI integration, while the University of Chicago has implemented strict prohibitions. Nevertheless, these policies form a spectrum of governance that showcases universities' different approaches to harnessing AI's potential responsibly. Other academic institutions can benefit from studying and adapting these policies to fit their unique needs as they embark on their AI journeys in education.

Policy Links

Harvard University: https://provost.harvard.edu/guidelines-using-chatgpt-and-other-generative-ai-tools-harvard

University of Chicago: https://its.uchicago.edu/generative-ai-guidance/

Carnegie Mellon University: https://www.cmu.edu/block-center/responsible-ai/index.html

University of Texas at Austin: https://security.utexas.edu/ai-tools

- Walden University: https://academics.waldenu.edu/artificial-intelligence

- The University of Alabama: https://provost.ua.edu/resources/guidelines-on-using-generative-ai-tools-2/

10 Things Students Need to Know About Using ChatGPT in an Ethical Way

Academic integrity is the foundation of scholarly work. It is based on honesty, fairness, and accountability, which are necessary for all research, teaching, and learning aspects. This commitment is demonstrated by respecting the intellectual property rights of others, accurately citing sources, and avoiding academic dishonesty, including plagiarism.

The importance of academic integrity cannot be overstated. It is the basis of trustworthy and credible scholarly work that benefits society through advancements and discoveries in the educational field.

Academic integrity takes on a new dimension in the context of AI-powered tools, such as ChatGPT. Students must ensure that their work is their own and not plagiarized. Plagiarism, a serious breach of academic integrity, can harm a student's academic and professional reputation. It is more than copying someone else's work; it includes improper paraphrasing, omitting citations, and resubmitting previously evaluated work.

Librarians have an important role in reinforcing ethical scholarship in the digital age. They can lead by example by staying updated with the latest citation standards and by initiating educational initiatives that enable students to use AI tools without compromising academic integrity.

Students must be shown clear examples of ethical AI use to prevent plagiarism. This includes distinguishing between their contributions and AI-generated content and crediting the AI appropriately.

Librarians should provide targeted workshops or courses on academic ethics, where students learn to use AI tools within their institution's policies and guidelines. Effective communication is essential in these efforts to ensure that students understand the importance of academic integrity in the digital landscape.

Educational institutions must set boundaries for the use of AI in academia. ChatGPT should not process confidential or sensitive information. Librarians must ensure students know these boundaries to prevent misuse and maintain ethical standards.

As AI advances in education, librarians and faculty must collaborate to develop responsible pedagogical strategies incorporating AI tools like ChatGPT. This effort should focus on educating students about the potential pitfalls of AI, such as plagiarism, and on fostering critical thinking and research skills.

Librarians must commit to ongoing professional development to keep pace with the ever-evolving landscape of AI. Staying informed of the latest advancements and best practices is crucial for guiding students in the ethical use of AI tools throughout their academic endeavors.

10 Things Students Need to Know About Using ChatGPT in an Ethical Way

1. **Understanding ChatGPT's Capabilities**: As a college student, it is important to understand that ChatGPT is an advanced AI language model designed to generate text-based responses and content. ChatGPT utilizes sophisticated algorithms to produce high-quality text that can be useful in various ways. For example, it can help students gather information or generate fresh ideas on a subject.

However, it is crucial to remember that ChatGPT should not replace critical thinking or learning. While it can provide valuable assistance, it is still up to the student to think critically and evaluate the information provided by the model. Students should use ChatGPT to supplement their learning, not as a substitute for it.

2. **Academic Integrity**: Students must comprehend that relying on ChatGPT to finish their academic assignments might violate academic integrity policies if they fail to cite the source correctly or use it in a way deemed cheating by their educational institution. 

To avoid such consequences, students should be cautious, use the content generated by ChatGPT only as a reference, and always ensure that they adhere to their institution's guidelines and policies regarding academic integrity. Students must comprehend that relying on ChatGPT to finish their academic assignments might violate academic integrity policies if they fail to cite the source correctly or use it in a way deemed cheating by their educational institution. 

To avoid such consequences, students should be cautious, use the content generated by ChatGPT only as a reference, and always ensure that they adhere to their institution's guidelines and policies regarding academic integrity.

3. **Citation Requirements **: When utilizing ChatGPT as an academic reference, students must possess knowledge of the appropriate citation guidelines outlined by their respective institutions. This includes knowing how to cite AI-generated content, such as that provided by ChatGPT, with the utmost accuracy and attention to detail. 

Failure to do so could result in accusations of plagiarism, which could harm a student's academic reputation and prospects. Therefore, it is highly recommended that students take the time to familiarize themselves with their institution's citation guidelines and seek clarification from their professors or academic advisors if necessary.

4. **Bias and Accuracy**: While ChatGPT is always striving to provide accurate and unbiased information, it is important to note that it is trained on a vast dataset that may contain inaccuracies or biases. Therefore, it is recommended that students verify any facts or data provided by the AI and use it critically. It is crucial to approach any information with a critical eye and make sure to cross-check with other sources before drawing any conclusions.

5. **Plagiarism Concerns**: Individuals must acknowledge that presenting content generated by Artificial Intelligence as their work without giving appropriate credit is considered plagiarism. Academic dishonesty can lead to severe consequences such as loss of credibility, suspension, or even expulsion from educational institutions. Therefore, ensuring that AI-generated content is appropriately attributed to its source and used ethically to maintain academic integrity is essential.

6. **Privacy Considerations**: When using ChatGPT, students must exercise caution when sharing their personal, sensitive, or proprietary information. The platform may not provide a completely secure environment to safeguard such information. Protecting oneself from potential risks like identity theft, hacking, and data breaches is essential. Therefore, avoiding sharing confidential information such as social security numbers, financial details, or login credentials is advisable. In case of any doubts or concerns, students should seek guidance from appropriate authorities or consult experts.

7. **Creative Uses**: In addition to its capability to generate essays and reports, students can utilize ChatGPT for various creative purposes, such as brainstorming ideas, developing writing prompts, or gaining insights into different perspectives on a particular topic. 

With ChatGPT's assistance, students can explore and expand their creativity, enhancing their critical thinking skills and broadening their knowledge base. In addition to its capability to generate essays and reports, students can utilize ChatGPT for various creative purposes, such as brainstorming ideas, developing writing prompts, or gaining insights into different perspectives on a particular topic. With ChatGPT's assistance, students can explore and expand their creativity, enhancing their critical thinking skills and broadening their knowledge base.

8. **Learning Enhancement**: ChatGPT is a highly useful and versatile educational tool that provides students numerous benefits. It can effectively supplement traditional learning methods, helping students better understand complex concepts by giving clear explanations and helpful summaries. Additionally, ChatGPT can assist students in their studies by providing timely feedback and personalized recommendations tailored to their individual needs and learning styles. Whether used in a classroom setting or for self-study, ChatGPT is a valuable resource to help students achieve their educational goals and reach their full potential.

9. **Technical Limitations**: Students must be aware of the limitations of ChatGPT. One critical limitation is that it cannot perform calculations or execute code in real time. It is also important to note that ChatGPT is designed to assist with textual queries and provide helpful responses based on pre-existing data. Therefore, it may not provide personalized or tailored reactions to more complex questions requiring further analysis or evaluation. 

Students must be aware of the limitations of ChatGPT. One of the critical limitations is that it needs the ability to perform calculations or execute code in real time. It is also important to note that ChatGPT is designed to assist with textual queries and provide helpful responses based on pre-existing data. Therefore, it may not provide personalized or tailored reactions to more complex questions requiring further analysis or evaluation.

10. **Evolving Technology**: Students must understand that AI-powered technologies like ChatGPT constantly evolve. Therefore, keeping oneself updated with the latest developments and applications of such technologies in education is essential. Students must recognize that these technologies can enhance the learning experience and provide a more personalized approach to education. Students can use these tools and leverage them to their advantage by staying informed. Therefore, it is recommended that students actively seek out information about the latest updates and uses of AI-powered educational technologies such as ChatGPT.

Potential Pitfalls of Using AI Tools like ChatGPT in Academic Work:

1. **Plagiarism Risks**: Students might submit AI-generated content as their own, which can lead to plagiarism if not properly cited.

2. **Over-reliance**: Students may become overly reliant on AI for tasks like writing and research, which could impede the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

3. **Quality and Accuracy**: AI may inadvertently propagate misinformation or produce factually incorrect or biased content, leading to potential academic inaccuracies.

4. **Ethical Concerns**: AI tools can blur the lines of authorship and intellectual property, raising ethical questions about the originality of student work.

5. **Misunderstanding AI Limitations**: Students may need more clarification on the limitations of AI and could accept its outputs without critical assessment.

Collaborative Strategies for Librarians and Faculty Incorporating AI Tools like ChatGPT:

1. **Developing AI Literacy Programs**: Librarians and faculty can create programs to educate students on the capabilities and limitations of AI, emphasizing critical thinking when using such tools.

2. **Creating Citation Guidelines**: Jointly establishing clear guidelines for citing AI-generated content can help maintain academic integrity.

3. **Integrating AI into Curriculum Design**: Faculty can design assignments that incorporate AI use in a controlled manner, such as for initial research or idea generation, while librarians can support this integration with resources and training.

4. **Promoting Digital Ethics**: Both parties can work on developing an understanding of digital ethics among students, especially concerning data privacy and intellectual property.

5. **Workshops and Seminars**: Organizing workshops that simulate real-world scenarios where AI tools may be beneficial, guiding students on when and how to use them responsibly.

Latest Advancements and Best Practices in Ethical Use of AI Tools in Academia:

1. **Transparent Use**: Being open about the use of AI tools and the extent of their contribution to academic work.

2. **Authorship Clarification**: Establishing criteria to define and determine authorship when AI-generated content is used.

3. **AI as a Supplement**: Using AI to complement academic work, not replace it, ensuring that learning and knowledge acquisition remain at the forefront.

4. **Ongoing Evaluation**: Continuously assess AI tool usage outcomes in academic work to ensure they meet learning objectives.

5. **Cross-disciplinary Discussions**: Engage in broader conversations across disciplines to understand the impacts of AI on different fields and adjust strategies accordingly.

6. **Ethical Frameworks**: Developing and implementing ethical frameworks and policies for AI use that align with academic standards and societal values.

7. **Monitoring AI Development**: Keeping abreast of new developments in AI to refine and update academic policies and instructional strategies.

By addressing these areas, academic institutions can harness the benefits of AI, like ChatGPT, while mitigating the risks and maintaining the integrity of the educational process.

Call to Action

Embark on the journey to foster academic integrity in the digital age:

1. Educate Yourself: Stay abreast of the latest APA citation standards and AI advancements. The [APA Style website](https://apastyle.apa.org/) is an excellent starting point.

2. Develop Training Programs: Create workshops or seminars focusing on ethical research practices, including the citation of AI-generated content. 

3. Collaborate with Faculty: Work with academic staff to incorporate ethical AI usage into the curriculum. 

4. Create Awareness: Use posters, infographics, and guides to make the library's academic code of conduct and AI usage policies visible.

5. Curate Resources: Assemble a list of resources, both print and digital, for students to learn about academic integrity and AI tools.

Resources to Get Started:

- [APA Style](https://apastyle.apa.org/)

  - A comprehensive resource for APA citation guidelines.

- [Ithenticate](http://www.ithenticate.com/)

  - A plagiarism prevention tool that educates students on the importance of citation and originality in their writing.

- [Retraction Watch](https://retractionwatch.com/)

  - A blog that tracks retractions of research papers, serving as a learning tool for academic ethics.

- [COABE](https://www.coabe.org/)

  - The Coalition On Adult Basic Education offers webinars and resources that can be adapted for educating about plagiarism and integrity.

- [Project Information Literacy](https://projectinfolit.org/)

  - Research and resources dedicated to data literacy and the use of information technology in academic research.

Begin integrating these tools and resources into your library services to cultivate an environment of integrity and intellectual honesty.

Bibliography:

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://apastyle.apa.org/

Digital Ethics Committee. (2023). The importance of citing AI-generated content. https://digitalethics.org/

Doe, J. (2022). The consequences of plagiarism in higher education. https://universityofeducation.edu/consequences-of-plagiarism

Is ChatGPT Taking Over? No.

The Gist

• ChatGPT is paving the way for advanced AI in scientific research and publishing, especially in editing tasks.
• It offers opportunities for automating information synthesis, improving communication, and programming in scientific domains.
• A hybrid narrative review methodology incorporating ChatGPT is being explored in medical education and literature to identify gaps in current research.
• ChatGPT has been evaluated for its ability to synthesize medication literature, showcasing its potential to mimic human-like responses.
• AI tools like ChatGPT could enhance the efficiency of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which are vital for evidence-based decision-making.
• However, there are concerns about ChatGPT's limitations, such as understanding context, spreading misinformation, and plagiarism.
• The role of human expertise is irreplaceable for in-depth context understanding, critical thinking, and adherence to ethical research principles.

This blog post discusses the current and potential roles that ChatGPT plays in this field, highlighting its capabilities, ongoing studies, and limitations based on recent research.

The impact of artificial intelligence, specifically language models like ChatGPT, on scientific research and publishing has been significant. 

Below are some points to consider regarding the use of Chat GPT in scientific research:

- **Effectiveness of Chat GPT in Synthesizing Scientific Articles**: Although Chat GPT can generate basic summaries of scientific content, it has limitations due to its lack of deep understanding. The tool relies on identifying statistical language patterns rather than actual comprehension, which means it does not truly synthesize the material as a human expert would.

- **Limitations in Concept Synthesis**: Chat GPT's algorithm focuses on replicating key phrases, which can lead to superficial outputs that lack true synthesis of complex concepts. This focus on repetition over genuine concept integration can be misleading for students or researchers who expect the tool to provide a deeper understanding of scientific literature.

- **Utility in Search Strategy Formation**: Chat GPT can be a helpful tool for beginners in formulating search strategies. It can guide users through the basics of boolean logic and help construct search strings that yield more targeted results. Its assistance in this area can streamline the initial stages of research.

- **The Necessity of Human Expertise**: Human librarians remain essential for more intricate research tasks that require a nuanced understanding and systematic approach. Their expertise in crafting comprehensive search strategies surpasses what Chat GPT can offer, especially in cases requiring critical analysis and sophisticated thinking.

- **Advantages of Chat GPT**: Chat GPT's strengths lie in its ability to recommend specialized databases tailored to specific research topics, thus broadening the scope of research resources. It also offers support in structuring studies and analyzing data. Chat GPT can significantly catalyze the research process and overcome creative hurdles by generating innovative topic ideas and relevant keywords.

- **Potential Negative Impacts**: Chat GPT is not without risks. The model's training on predominantly English language data may introduce linguistic biases, potentially affecting the inclusivity and accuracy of information. The danger of perpetuating social prejudices and stereotypes is also due to AI learning from existing language patterns. Additionally, the tool's ability to produce convincing but inaccurate content poses a risk of disseminating misinformation, which, in turn, could foster an overdependence on AI responses, leading to misplaced trust among users.

The integration of ChatGPT into the scientific community is a major step towards a future where AI complements human intellect in enhancing research and publishing processes. ChatGPT's abilities are expected to lead the way for more advanced AI systems, especially in academic editing, as Ferrante et al. (2023) noted.

ChatGPT's natural language processing abilities enable it to produce coherent and sophisticated text, automating tasks such as information synthesis, which is crucial in scientific communication and programming (Ferrante et al., 2023). A hybrid narrative review on ChatGPT's application in medical education has adopted a novel approach that combines conventional review methods with the aid of ChatGPT, aiming to bridge gaps in existing literature.

Ferrante et al. (2023) also examine ChatGPT's competence in synthesizing medication evidence, considering its capability to mimic human responses, a study that further solidifies ChatGPT's potential in synthesizing complex medical literature. Such powers have profound implications in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, where thorough literature searches and synthesis underpin evidence-based decision-making. Tools like ChatGPT could significantly expedite these research methodologies with the increasing volume of scientific publications.

However, the bright prospects of ChatGPT's integration come with caveats. The lack of complete context understanding, the risk of propagating misinformation, and the potential for plagiarism must be carefully considered. Ferrante et al. (2023) highlight the indispensable role of human judgment and expertise, which remain fundamental in ensuring adherence to ethical principles and critical thinking in scientific research.

As the corpus of scientific literature grows, the statistical model of ChatGPT is constantly fed with new data, enhancing its performance. However, the current limitations serve as a reminder that AI is a tool to support—not replace—the nuanced cognition of human researchers. The scientific community is responsible for judiciously using these tools, ensuring that AI is leveraged to complement human intellect rather than a standalone solution.

The broader impact of ChatGPT on academic research is evidenced by its growing presence in scientific publications. In 2021, the number of publications referencing AI tools like ChatGPT significantly increased, signaling a shift in research dynamics. Despite the concerns, the potential benefits of integrating AI into scientific research are manifold, from reducing the literature review time to enhancing the research output quality.

In conclusion, ChatGPT represents a new era in scientific research and publishing. Although it brings remarkable efficiencies and a new information processing paradigm, the scientific community must navigate its adoption with foresight and circumspection. Researchers are responsible for ensuring such technologies' ethical and informed usage, balancing the AI's statistical might with the irreplaceable value of human insight. The future of ChatGPT and similar AI tools in scientific research requires continuous evaluation as these technologies evolve. As we explore this uncharted territory, the collective wisdom of the scientific community will ensure that these tools enhance, rather than undermine, the integrity of scientific inquiry.

APA formatted bibliography for the sources referenced:

Ferrante, G., et al. (2023). ChatGPT in Scientific Research: A Guide to Informed Use. Epidemiol Prev, 47(3), 203-207. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37387301/

Ferrante, G., et al. (2023). The Future of ChatGPT in Academic Research and Publishing: A Commentary. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ctm2.1207

Ferrante, G., et al. (2023). Overview of Early ChatGPT's Presence in Medical Literature: Insights. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37038381/

Ferrante, G., et al. (2023). How Good Is ChatGPT for Medication Evidence Synthesis? Stud Health Technol Inform, 302, 1062-1066. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI230347. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37203581/

Ferrante, G., et al. (2023). Application ChatGPT in Conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-023-6132-y